false implication and
opted to lead defence evidence. Accused Sunil Chauhan also took
defence of false implication and did not opt to lead defence evidence ... case and he also opted
to lead defence evidence.
17. Accused Manoj took the defence of false implication and did
not opt to lead defence
Narayan is subjected to extensive cross-examination to
buttress the defence of false implication. Several suggestions are given
to PW 2 Vasegiri Narayan ... defence clearly established that
the prosecution version was inherently incredible and unbelievable.
The learned Sessions Judge failed to appreciate that the defence of false
implication
their involvement, pleaded that they are totally
innocent and have been falsely implicated.
Defence examined DW-1, Sulakshan Singh
appellant sent to jail.
Appellant thus claims to have been falsely implicated. The
defence of the appellant was found to be false. The appellant ... taken note
of.
As regards the appellant's defence of being falsely implicated
on account of the failure of father of the prosecutrix
They denied their involvement in the commission of crime and claimed
false implication. Defence of Harish was that on the day of incident ... Parade.
The defence of accused Praveen was that since the police could not
apprehend the actual accused persons, he was being falsely implicated
aware about the same. He has stated that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the alleged ... accused/appellant examined himself and appeared as D.W. 2. The defence has further stated that he wanted to rely upon the documents proved, which
defence of accused is of false implication. Apart from the defence of false implication further defence of accused persons Suraj and Matru is that
Appellant. Appellant denied the guilt and
claimed trial, raising the defence of false implication.
20. In order to prove its case against the Appellant, Prosecution ... examined as many as 35 witnesses, whereas, to prove his defence of
false implication, Appellant also led the evidence of one witness by name
ground has been shown for alleged false-
implication.
xii. The defence of false implication is unbelievable and
unsustainable. Informant was not any way connected
under Section 313 Cr.P.C., appellant pleaded false implication and preparation of false documents. His defence case is that on 24.12.2007, he along with ... wife D.W.-1 resisted the arrest and false implication then false recovery of another 4.15 kgs of smack was planted and appellant was roped
