Rajiv Sharma & Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 December, 2015
Rajiv Sharma & Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 December, 2015
Bench: Rajiv
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 233 (1.43 seconds)Mohd. Shahid vs State Nct Of Delhi on 4 December, 2015
supra) discusses in detail
what is meant by the term ―confession‖, a term not defined in the
Evidence Act , to observe that vide definition given ... Pakala Narayana Swami case and their
approval in Palvinder Kaur case defined a confession as ―an
admission of the offence by a person charged with
Pankaj Sharma vs State Of Haryana on 15 September, 2015
Supreme Court considered as to what is meant by confession. It was
found that the confession is a statement made by an accused, which must ... would
amount to a confession. The Court observed as under:
"10. The expression "confession" is not defined in the Evidence
K.Ramesh vs The Intelligence Officer on 28 July, 2015
confession statement of
Ramesh (A2), it is necessary to briefly re-state the law governing the
admissibility of confessions. The Evidence Act does not define ... incriminating fact, is not, by itself, a confession. Confessions are a
species of admissions which are defined in Section 17 of the Evidence
Sunil Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 21 December, 2015
insisted upon, more often than not evidentiary value of extra judicial
confession has to be thrown out as unreliable and not useful. That
cannot ... founded. Such confession should be clear, specific
and unambiguous.
10. The expression 'confession' is not defined in the Evidence Act ,
'Confession
Indra Dalal vs State Of Haryana on 29 May, 2015
well as the High Courts.
The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have
resorted to the dictionary meaning ... commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore,
inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean a direct
acknowledgment of guilt
Barju Sah vs State Of Jharkhand on 13 August, 2015
take into consideration such confession as
against such other person as well as against person who makes such
confession".
48. The evidentiary value ... against a co-accused. Thus though
such a confession may not be evidence as strictly defined by Section 3
of the Evidence
Indra Dalal vs State Of Haryana on 29 May, 2015
well as the High
Courts.
17) The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the
courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning ... commission of the crime would amount to
confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is
also defined to mean a direct acknowledgment of guilt
T.Kamalakkannan vs State By Inspector Of Police on 2 September, 2015
follows:-
"The confession of an accused person is not evidence in the ordinary
sense of the term as defined in Section 3 . It cannot ... does not say that the confession is to amount
to proof. Clearly there must be other evidence. The confession is only one
element
Afroz Mohmad Hasanfatta vs Deputy Director & on 5 October, 2015
from whom a confession is
obtained. The court further held that the term "police officer"
has not been defined in the Code ... capable of exercising influence or authority over a person
from whom the confession is obtained.
4.8 Referring to the preamble