Bije at
Gatiroutpatana in the district of /Cuttack (for brevity 'the Deity'). The
Deity is public in nature being worshiped by the villagers ... immovable properties. The Sevayats are possessing
the immovable properties of the Deity and performing the Nitikanti.
B) Recently, the Sebayats started construction of permanent
structures
Bije at Adhanga, district-Jagatsinghpur (defendant
No.1) (for short, 'the deity'). The then Managing Trustee of the deity,
Sri Harekrushna Tripathy sold ... possession in the remarks
column. On 04.12.1995, the Managing Trustee of the deity filed a
petition under Section 25 of the OHRE Act for recovery
name of the Petitioner as an under-raiyat under deity Sri
Raghunath Jew Bije at Paikapadapatna under the said tahasil.
3. Case of the Petitioners ... 4221 of 1998 Page 1 of 11
// 2 //
01.01.1919 in which deity Sri Raghunath Jew-Opposite Party No.4
(for short, 'the deity
land') in the name of the Petitioners as under-raiyats under deity
Sri Raghunath Jew Bije at Paikapadapatna under the said tahasil.
3. Case ... 4221 of 1998 Page 1 of 11
// 2 //
01.01.1919 in which deity Sri Raghunath Jew-Opposite Party No.4
(for short, 'the deity
suit
for recovery of possession of property of public deity is
maintainable?
ii) Whether in view of dismissal of petition under Section ... Ordinate Judge, Khordha was that the plaintiff No.1 is a
public deity and plaintiff No.2 and 3 and proforma defendant No.2
(proforma
favour of the Petitioners to alienate the
property of the Deity Sri Raghunath Jew, Bije At-Rameswar, under
Jankia Police Station in the district ... Khordha, (for brevity, 'the
Deity') was rejected.
3. The admitted facts, as revealed from the record, are that,
the Deity is a private
name of
Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu Bije Puri (for short, 'the deity') in
settlement ROR in the year 1899. By operation of Section ... Temple is the Marfatdar of the property
belonging to the deity. The petitioner-Math was only entrusted to
manage the properties. The erstwhile Marfatdar
refused to grant permission to alienate the immovable
property of the said Deity.
4. It is submitted that while adjudicating the matter,
learned Commissioner raised ... Nrusingha Swami Bije, Puruna Berhampur, Patarasahi are one
and the same Deity or not. However, the trustee being
WP(C) No. 9511 of 2021 Page
Dash, learned counsel submits that the Petitioner has
installed deities, more fully, described in the petition under
Section ... residence. He is the marfatdar of
the said Deities. Public have no access either to the premises of
the Petitioner or to the bijesthali
filed under Section 19-A of the Act (Annexure-1) is that Deity Sri
W.P.(C) No. 2388 OF 2026
Page ... under Tangi Tahasil in the
district of Cuttack (for brevity 'the Deity') is the family Deity of
the Petitioners. The bijesthali
