present at the scene of offence. 1st petitioner who is
Mandal Revenue Officer is not present at the scene of offence and he was
working ... there is no participation of ladies at the scene of offence is not a case
for deletion. In fact the charges are framed against
submitted documents
to prove that he was not at the scene of offence on that day.
3
He argues that the police have verified ... conclusion that he was not present at the scene of
offence on 27.07.2010. The police have deleted the name of
the present petitioner by following
case. They examined other witnesses and examined the scene of
offence. A-2 name was deleted from the charge sheet as none
supported the case
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
incriminating material i.e. crime
weapons from the scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted
Section 307 |.P.C. But, later the second
incriminating material i.e. crime weapons from the
scene of offence and after examining the witnesses deleted Section
307 I.P.C. But, later
