Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 696 (1.97 seconds)

State vs . Happy Grover on 14 January, 2020

9328/7 Multani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, Delhi. 4) Offence complained of : U/s. 33/38 Delhi Excise Act 5) The plea of accused : Pleaded ... compliance of Section 207 Cr. P.C. Thereafter, charge was framed against the accused under Section 33 / 38 Delhi Excise Act, to which he pleaded
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ramesh on 13 January, 2020

completed and police report under section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed under sections 38 Delhi Excise Act of the prescribed duty, hence, accused also ... charge against accused Babita was framed under section U/s 38 of Delhi Excise Act by Ld. Predecessor vide order dated 07.01.2017. Accused pleaded
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Rahul on 30 July, 2020

COURTS, DELHI IN THE MATTER OF : State Vs. Rahul FIR No. 603/2016 PS : Uttam Nagar U/s 33/38 Delhi Excise Act Date ... Baljeet Nagar, New Delhi 5. Offence charged : U/s 33/38 Delhi Excise Act, 2009 6. Plea of accused : Not guilty 7. Final Order : Acquitted
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ajay Rana on 27 February, 2020

excise duty has not been paid. Therefore, the accused was alleged to have committed offence punishable u/s 33 / 38 / 58D Delhi Excise Act ... provisions of section 207 Cr.P.C vide order dated 12.11.2013, charges u/s 33 / 38 / 58D Delhi Excise Act were framed against the accused
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next