drew a demand draft of the
said amount from his bank i.e. Axis Bank, Jodhpur Branch and
deposited the said demand draft ... error of the complainant's
bank, such demand draft was lost in transit and actual payment
therefore, was not received by the complainant
prove that plaintiff
No.1 has sent demand draft to defendant
No.2 and it was lost in transit and not
received by defendant ... altered the demand
draft by including fraudulently the name
of S.Sandeep Kumar and encashed the
amount through demand draft?
4) Whether the plaintiffs prove
dated
06.12.2010 have been lost. After adopting the process regarding
loss of demand draft, it issued fresh DD. OP no.1 controverted the
other averments
contract also prescribes the consequences of default. Admittedly, the plaintiff has not demanded specific performance of the contract within in the 3 months period ... promptly replied that plaintiff has lost his right to seek specific performance. They have also enclosed a demand draft for Rs.4,00,000/- towards
post was indeed booked by the Complainant, stated that the same got lost on the way. According to this OP, the dispute was related ... Admittedly, the Demand Draft in question was booked through the Appellant No. 1 by the Respondent No. 1 and the same got lost in transit
admittedly, the
Bakijai Clearance Certificate furnished by the respondent No.4 had
lost its validity on 26.06.2015 i.e. the date on which the tenders ... submitted by the
respondent No.4 in the form of Demand Draft whereas, as per Clause
4(e) of the NIT , the same ought
returned the entire amount of the
applicant on 03.09.2012, vide demand draft no.
374770 dated 01.09.2012 for Rs. 55,70,692/-. It is
an admitted ... petitioners/appellants, the bank refunded the entire
amount vide demand draft drawn in favour of the
petitioners/appellants. The same was received by the
petitioners
clients who had invested
their money in the PMS operation has lost any money. Learned
Counsel argued that charges levelled in the second charge-sheet ... further contends
that the documents demanded by the petitioner and which were
relied upon by the management to draft the charge sheet were
denied
returned the entire amount of the
applicant on 03.09.2012, vide demand draft no.
374770 dated 01.09.2012 for Rs. 55,70,692/-. It is
an admitted ... petitioners/appellants, the bank refunded the entire
amount vide demand draft drawn in favour of the
petitioners/appellants. The same was received by the
petitioners
rent according to the
above gazette notification had lost its force, and for quashing the
demands for lease premium and seeking to prevent the respondent ... lacs with the
respondent No. 1 by way of a bank draft within a fortnight status quo
would be maintained, in terms of the said
