Rajagopalan etc. that "if: an employee is
dismissed or demoted and it is his case that the dismissal
or demotion is wrongful, it would ... recovery of his salary or wages under
section 33C(2) . His demotion or dismissal may give rise to
an industrial dispute which may be appropriately
denied any
declaration to him and (ii) that the order of demotion
passed against him was illegal. The High Court decreed the
suit and held ... Railway. The appellant's case is
that, despite his demotion, he continued to perform the
duties of the Office Superintendent presumably because
exist. The
Division Bench then held that there was no question of
demotion or reduction in rank and hence that ... face of the
impugned order, that the appellant had been demoted as a
measure of punishment. [455 F-G]
(3) it could not be held
name appeared in the
previous list from the subsequent list or his demotion in
rank in the subsequent list. As there
State Of Karnataka vs Union Of India & Another on 8 November, 1977
Equivalent citations
appellant
undertaking, established under the Delhi Transport Authority
Act, challenged his demotion by filing a petition under
Article 226 of the Constitutions. After the dismissal ... filing a writ petition in the High
Court against the demotion without exhausting
departmental remedies but the question of motive is
immaterial. No charge-sheet
second
opportunity by the punishing authority before it inflicted
the punishment of demotion. Nothing further was required by
law. And, it was probably because ... discharge of his
duties that he was given the lesser punishment of demotion
and neither dismissed nor removed from service.
A suit challenging the validity
service. It, therefore, held that no question of demotion or reduction in rank, without observing the procedure laid down in Article 311 of the Constitution ... above, we find nothing there to indicate that the petitioner had been demoted as a measure of punishment. To hold, as it was suggested that
name appeared in the previous list from the subsequent list or his demotion in rank in the subsequent list. As there
disciplinary proceedings against the respondent,
a head constable, the Superintendent of Police demoted him
as a police constable. The appeal ... Superintendent of Police found him
guilty of the charge and demoted him as a police constable.
The respondent preferred an appeal to the Deputy Inspector
