CCSC/11/2021 and I/A/CCSC/12/2021, both dated 19.02.2021,
demoting/reverting/reassigning the applicants and other similarly
situated Inspectors.
(b) such other ... vacancy years mentioned in their respective orders of promotion,
have suddenly been demoted/reverted/ reassigned to the original
position/lower grade/post held by them
other officers promoted vide
order dated 6.10.2018 were also mechanically demoted though they were
within the sanctioned strength
2018, applicant no. 1, Naval Employees Union assailed the order of demoting the applicants no.2 to 22 and similarly placed individuals and has also ... 10th January, 2018. Applicant nos. 2 to 22 were promoted and thereafter demoted, the details of which are given in a tabulated form thus:
Applicantno
2018, applicant no. 1, Naval Employees Union assailed the order of demoting the applicants no.2 to 22 and similarly placed individuals and has also ... 10th January, 2018. Applicant nos. 2 to 22 were promoted and thereafter demoted, the details of which are given in a tabulated form thus:
Applicantno
2018, applicant no. 1, Naval Employees Union assailed the order of demoting the applicants no.2 to 22 and similarly placed individuals and has also ... 10th January, 2018. Applicant nos. 2 to 22 were promoted and thereafter demoted, the details of which are given in a tabulated form thus:
Applicantno
cadre of Security Officers and apprehends that he may be demoted by respondent No.1 and according to him in case if he is demoted ... Delhi Jal Board (respondent No.1 herein). He has not been demoted by respondent No.1 from the post of Deputy Chief Security Officer till
Mumbai. The applicant has, however, decided to challenge
the said order of demotion separately.
c) The Respondents in the year 2019, prepared the draft seniority ... Yard, Karwar w.e.f. 30.6.2017. On
joining Karwar, applicant was accordingly demoted to lower direct
recruitment grade of Tradesman Skilled and placed at bottom
failed to clear type test on three occasions, it was
proposed to demote/revert him in Group 'D' post and
was given time ... Annexure A/6). After that respondents
did not pass any orders of demoting/reverting the
applicant and was, thus, in bonafide belief that no
action
failed to clear type test on three occasions, it was
proposed to demote/revert him in Group 'D' post and
was given time ... Annexure A/6). After that respondents
did not pass any orders of demoting/reverting the
applicant and was, thus, in bonafide belief that no
action
Mate due to family circumstances.
Considering application filed by the applicant, respondents
demoted the applicant from the post of Mate to Trackman and
posted ... under the LARSGESS Scheme, he should have submitted the
3
application for demoting him either to avail the benefits of
LARSGESS Scheme
