Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 639 (1.05 seconds)

B.R. Meena vs Union Of India on 24 December, 2018

deputation period was of three years would automatically be eligible for extension of deputation 3 tenure for seven years, in spite of that the Tribunal ... advance notice, has submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for extension of deputation tenure up to seven years, therefore, the Tribunal has rightly rejected
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meena Srivastava vs M/O Home Affairs on 2 July, 2018

Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Faizabad, UP from 16.01.1988 to 15.01.1991. Further extension of her deputation beyond 15.01.1991 was not permissible under the Rules. However, the applicant ... June, 2010 and to say that as per existing instructions no extension in deputation beyond the fifth year is allowed. Further
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J Ajay Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 3 October, 2018

deputation if no order extending his/her deputation has been issued by the concerned Cadre Cantrolling Authority because of the fact that extension in. deputation ... conveyed their approval of the competent authority for the extension of the Inter Cadre Deputation of the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahesh Kumar Meena vs M/O Finance on 14 March, 2018

deputation post and has to be filled up by deputation only. 2.1 On completion of three years, the applicant was given extension ... extensions have been duly approved by competent authority. 2.2 As per DoP&T OM dated 17.02.2016, extension of deputation beyond a period of five
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next