deputation with effect from 1-4-1987 resolved to absorb the deputationist to its fold with effect from 5-6-1983 instead ... appointment of the petitioner in the Institute.
6. About petitioner:
Apart from deputationist, the respondent-Institute had also appointed its own employees. Petitioner
years and
maximum period of 5 years tenure for such
deputationist. Relying on this circular, it is contended
that the petitioner could not have been ... explained the law relating to the right of such
deputationist
6
:7:
" 6. ...It is well settled that unless the
claim of the deputationist
continue in the post
of Tahsildar (Grade-I), Bengaluru South Taluk. The
deputationist could be repatriated to their parent cadre at
any point of time ... ANOTHER11 , the Hon'ble Apex Court has held
that a deputationist cannot assert and succeed in his claim
for permanent absorption in the department
regularised with the condition that as and
when absorption of the Deputationists took place, the total
length of service would be taken in a particular ... accordingly, a Circular dated
28/05/1987 was issued calling upon the Deputationists
to exercise their option for absorption on a one-time basis
OTHERS and submitted that if the
tenure is fixed for deputation, deputationist should not be withdrawn before
the expiry of the said period except ... India`s case referred supra at para 32, has
observed that the deputationist has no legal right to continue in a post. A
deputationist indisputably
petitioner has
4
taken charge and he has been continued as
deputationist on the request of first respondent.
When the petitioner has been working ... para 6 has held that the deputationist has no
right to seek continuation of his services, he can
always and at any time be repatriated
deputation for over eight years. The
Writ Court has held that a deputationist cannot assert a
vested right to continue on deputation with the
borrowing ... Government Circular dated 15.01.1977 to contend that
this Circular confers upon the deputationists -
appellants - a right to continue on deputation unless
the repatriation orders
Institute through letters dated
25.10.2007 had stated that absorption of deputationists was
required. The Director of respondent No.2 - Institute again
sent a communication dated ... were appointed through direct
recruitment and 15 posts were reserved for deputationists in
view to absorb them against the Government Notification.
The Director also requested
Institute through letters dated
25.10.2007 had stated that absorption of deputationists was
required. The Director of respondent No.2 - Institute again
sent a communication dated ... were appointed through direct
recruitment and 15 posts were reserved for deputationists in
view to absorb them against the Government Notification.
The Director also requested
Institute through letters dated
25.10.2007 had stated that absorption of deputationists was
required. The Director of respondent No.2 - Institute again
sent a communication dated ... were appointed through direct
recruitment and 15 posts were reserved for deputationists in
view to absorb them against the Government Notification.
The Director also requested