Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 829 (1.01 seconds)

Rajeev Ranjan vs Uoi & Others Through on 29 January, 2015

case (supra), the Honble Supreme Court held thus: 32. Ordinarily, a deputationist has no legal right to continue in the post. A deputationist indisputably ... parent service. When the tenure of deputation is specified, despite a deputationist not having an indefeasible right to hold the said post, ordinarily the term
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Sushovan Banarjee vs The Union Of India on 8 September, 2010

contention of the respondents that the applicant was merely a deputationist, as such, he does not have a right to notice or prior intimation ... lending department. Since it is a tripartite agreement, premature repatriation of a deputationist is possible only after giving reasonable notice to the official as well
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

R.P. Juyal (Section Officer) vs Union Of India Through on 6 February, 2014

tenure deputation can be prematurely terminated by an order simpliciter repatriating the deputationist to his parent organization? (iii) Whether the repatriation of the applicant ... appointments. Therefore, when the tenure of deputation is specified, despite a deputationist not having an indefeasible right to hold the said post, ordinarily the term
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Dr. Rani Gera vs Union Of India Through on 12 April, 2013

date of her absorption. 3. Later on, some of the similarly placed deputationists, namely, Dr. Snehal Bhave (supra), Dr. Sandhya Ranjan (supra) and Dr. Pankaj ... Roop Lal Vs. Lt. Governor 2000 (1) SCC 644, the deputationists are to be given seniority taking into full account the equivalent service rendered
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next