case (supra), the Honble Supreme Court held thus:
32. Ordinarily, a deputationist has no legal right to continue in the post. A deputationist indisputably ... parent service. When the tenure of deputation is specified, despite a deputationist not having an indefeasible right to hold the said post, ordinarily the term
Relan submits that the law is well settled that ordinarily a
deputationist has no legal right to continue at a particular post. He further
submits ... explaining the sensitive nature of the job to be performed by
these deputationists in SPG made the following neat
submissions:
1. The petitioners were
Relan submits that the law is well settled that ordinarily a
deputationist has no legal right to continue at a particular post. He further
submits ... explaining the sensitive nature of the job to be performed by
these deputationists in SPG made the following neat
submissions:
1. The petitioners were
Regulations, 2009 and notified it on 23.10.2009. By the said amendment, the deputationists who were less than 56 years ... wait indefinitely for no objection from the parent Department of the deputationist and it will be well within their jurisdiction to presume no objection
find it sticky. We close this issue by simply holding that a deputationist has no right, as it would appear from the above decisions ... besides reiterating its earlier position that absorption is not a right of deputationist, this Bench of the Tribunal had also taken into account the provisions
have filed their counter affidavit stating therein that absorption of a deputationist is a tripartite agreement amongst the lending department, the borrowing department ... parent department before processing the case further, but the applicant being a deputationist is not vested with any right of permanent absorption. It is only
Whether there is any statutory provision that
pay being drawn by the deputationist at the time
of absorption and the gains of his previous
service ... amended from
time to time for fixation of pay of the deputationist
State Police Officers on their permanent absorption in
the Intelligence Bureau
while representing the respondents
opposed the prayer and vehemently contended that a deputationist has no
indefeasible right to continue in the borrowing department ... dated 17.06.2010 which provides that a
deputationist could be returned to the lending department after giving an
advance notice of at least three months
2263/14 and connected cases
23.10.2009. By the said amendment, the
deputationists who were less than 56 years ... indefinitely for
'no objection' from the parent Department of the
deputationist and it will be well within their
jurisdiction to presume
2263/14 and connected cases
23.10.2009. By the said amendment, the
deputationists who were less than 56 years ... indefinitely for
'no objection' from the parent Department of the
deputationist and it will be well within their
jurisdiction to presume
