statement/complaint of Ct. Yogesh (complainant) which
shows any design to commit cognizable offence nor there is
satisfaction of IO that any offence under such ... originates only on the
knowledge of a design to commit cognizable offence if it appears
that the commission of offence cannot be prevented unless power
police officer, who receives any information with
15
regard to a design to commit any cognizable offence, to
communicate such information to the police officer ... commission of
cognizable offences:
(1) A police officer knowing of a design to commit any
cognizable offence may arrest, without orders from a
Magistrate
fake/managed Ids, exchanged emails through encrypted
messages for concealing the design to commit the crime.
A4 Practiced firing, identified targets for killing to incite ... exchanged in emails through encrypted messages for
concealing the design to commit the crime.
12 Spl.C.C.No.52/2013
A7 Came to Bangalore
playing into the hands of the investigating officer
if the investigation is designedly defective. In Paras Yadav & Ors. v. State
of Bihar ... held that it may be that such lapse is committed
designedly or because of negligence and hence the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
ability, prevent, the commission of any cognizable offence.
150. Information of design to commit cognizable offences – Every
police officer receiving information of a design ... commission of cognizable offences – (1) A
police officer, knowing of a design to commit any cognizable offence may
arrest, without orders from a Magistrate
this Court held:-
It may be that such lapse is committed designedly or
because of negligence. Hence the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
would amount to giving
premium for the wrongs of the prosecution designedly
committed to favour the appellant. In such cases, the story
of the prosecution
favour of the accused, may be that such
lapse is committed designedly or because of negligence. Hence, the
prosecution evidence is required to be examined
owner for completion of the entire work".
19. The Designate should have avoided the risks and dangers involved in
deciding an issue relating ... limited issue of
appointing an Arbitrator. It is clear that the Designate committed a
jurisdictional error in dismissing the application filed by the appellant under
there is no arbitration agreement
between the parties and the learned designate committed a serious error in
allowing the application under Sections
