Smt. Savita Devi vs Smt. Uma Devi on 18 October, 2014
whimsical and are not genuine.
11. The malafide intention and dishonest designs committed on the
part of the petitioner can very well be inferred
Search Results Page
Search Results
31 - 40 of 10776 (7.12 seconds)State vs . Virender Narain Saxena on 25 June, 2013
respect
of which [ ***] criminal breach of trust has been committed, is
designated as " stolen property', [ whether the transfer has been
made ... respect
of which criminal breach of trust has been committed, is designated as stolen
property. In the present case the prosecution has not produced
State vs Mohd. Shamim & Anr. on 8 August, 2012
would amount to giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution
designedly committed to favour the appellant. In such cases, the story of the
prosecution
State vs . Gulab @ Bablu S/O Tara Chand, on 7 January, 2010
favour of the accused, may be that
such lapse is committed designedly or because of
negligence. Hence, the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined ... would amount to
giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution
designedly committed to favour the appellant. In
such cases, the story of the prosecution
State vs Rajesh @ Gora Pandit on 14 September, 2012
would amount to giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution
designedly committed to favour the appellant. In such cases, the story of the
prosecution
State vs . Rajesh Kumar S/O Baleshwar, on 20 August, 2010
favour of the accused,
may be that such lapse is committed designedly
or because of negligence. Hence, the prosecution
evidence is required to be examined ... would amount to
giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution
designedly committed to favour the appellant. In
such cases, the story of the prosecution
Smt. Savita Devi vs Sh. Sachin Gupta on 18 October, 2014
whimsical and are not genuine.
11. The malafide intention and dishonest designs committed on the
part of the petitioner can very well be inferred
Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals ... vs Grasp Engineering And Solutions on 5 June, 2024
question the validity of the design
registered in favour of the Plaintiff, the statutory assumption is that the design
registration is valid ... damages in favour of the
Plaintiff, for the infringement of its design committed by the Defendant.
13. As regards the question whether
State vs Julfikar on 23 September, 2023
this Court
held :-
"...It may be that such lapse is committed designedly or
because of negligence. Hence the prosecution evidence
is required
Sh. Anuj Kaushik vs The State on 18 January, 2023
originates only
on the knowledge of a design to commit cognizable offence if it
appears that the commission of offence cannot be prevented
unless power ... supported when the
person to be arrested designs to commit a cognizable
offence. If a proceeding under Sections 107 / 151 appears
to be absolutely necessary