this Court held:-
It may be that such lapse is committed designedly or
because of negligence. Hence the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
would
amount to giving premium for the wrongs of
the prosecution designedly committed to favour
the appellant. In such cases, the story of the
prosecution
HCHP
16
accused, may be that such lapse is committed designedly
or because of negligence. Hence, the prosecution evidence
is required to be examined
playing
into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly
defective. In Paras Yadav v. State of Bihar while commenting upon certain ... held that it may be that such lapse
is committed designedly or because of negligence and hence the prosecution
evidence is required to be examined
State vs N. Dev Dass Singha on 6 March, 2010
1
IN THE COURT OF
Rajendra Singh S/O Matol Singh And ... vs State Of U.P. on 28 September
favour of the accused, may be that such
lapse is committed designedly or because of
negligence. Hence, the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
would be giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution
designedly committed to favour to them. The Trial Court primarily based
conviction on the circumstances
that the offence of murder like any other factum of death was committed and it must be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence albeit ... would amount to giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution designedly committed to favour the appellants. In such cases the story of the prosecution
that the offence of murder like any other factum of death was committed and it must be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence albeit ... would amount to giving premium for the wrongs of the prosecution designedly committed to favour the appellants. In such cases the story of the prosecution
