playing into the hands of the investigating officer
if the investigation is designedly defective. In Paras Yadav & Ors. v. State
of Bihar ... held that it may be that such lapse is committed
designedly or because of negligence and hence the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
this Court held:-
It may be that such lapse is committed designedly or
because of negligence. Hence the prosecution evidence is
required to be examined
would amount to giving
premium for the wrongs of the prosecution designedly
committed to favour the appellant. In such cases, the story
of the prosecution
favour of the accused, may be that such
lapse is committed designedly or because of negligence. Hence, the
prosecution evidence is required to be examined
would
amount to giving premium for the wrongs of
the prosecution designedly committed to favour
the appellant. In such cases, the story of the
prosecution
HCHP
16
accused, may be that such lapse is committed designedly
or because of negligence. Hence, the prosecution evidence
is required to be examined
favour of the accused, may be that such
lapse is committed designedly or because of negligence. Hence, the
prosecution evidence is required to be examined
deceased and no
obstruction could be possible to carry out the design of
committing these murders.
Allowing the appeal in part,
HELD : A criminal case ... deceased and no obstruction could be possible to carry out
the design of committing these murders". Before giving
these reasons, quoted mostly
favour of the accused, may be that such lapse is committed designedly or because of negligence. Hence, the prosecution evidence is required to be examined
Jai @ Gudda Jaiswal And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh 42 Cra/492/2012 ... on 10
