view of the above, it cannot be said
that the Designate Judge committed any
error in nominating Mr.D.V.Seetharama
Murthy, Sr. Advocate ... submission of
the learned senior counsel for the petitioner
that the Designate Judge ought to have
8
given an opportunity to the petitioner to
nominate
agency, known as M/s Aruna Gardeners and
Land Scape Designers, as well as a birth certificate purported to have
been issued by the Head ... securing the post by using the said documents and
therefore, has committed offences punishable under the aforesaid
provisions of the IPC for wrongful gain
iiyi.lge'd in assa«I.llt_and committed atrocity.
investigated by the designated Deputy
Su.4perintenE'dent of Police and charge sheet
inspecting the unit, their suspidon translated
into belief that he had committed the offences punishable
under Sections 135 and 138 of the Act and thus ... Vigilance Police Station established at
MESCOM, when offences committed or are
believed to have been reasonably committed
under Sections 135 to ;153 of the Electricity
deceased was a qualified
Fashion Designer and bride-dressing decorator, Ex.P89
Certificate of Fashion Designer has been produced. Further
evidence that the deceased ... earning about Rs.15,000/-
per month, the tribunal committed an error in not assessing
the said income for the purpose of awarding compensation
under
Indian
entity. Regarding terms and conditions of such appointment
and designation of first defendant, defendants 1 & 2 had
agreed to enter into ... first defendant being
tempted by the offer made by second defendant had
committed breach of confidentiality and also transferred
from the plaintiff's Email
oral evidence adduced, came to the
conclusion that the Labour Court committed no illegality in
recording a finding that appellant is not a workman. Therefore ... order of
appointment clearly establishes that though the designation of
6
the appellant was that of a Manager, he was carrying on the
duties
same and the same has been
deliberately suppressed unless there was a design in seeking to foist a
case against the accused.
Further, the evidence ... which event, it could not be said that
accused no.1 had committed any offence as alleged by the
prosecution. The presence of accused
have been committed by the petitioners, punishable under
Section 24 of the Act, as it would apply only when the
offence is committed on land ... omission and
commission of the petitioners which include their alleged
sinister design to usurp forest land by concocting
5
documents. He assertively submits they have
sinister
design, initiated prosecution in Spl.Case No.34/05
alleging that that the petitioners along with others
had physically assaulted him and committed
atrocity
