M/S.Dilipkumar Nalinkant Gandhi vs State Of Gujarat & ... on 27 July, 2015
Author
application
objecting the mark 'Exhibit16' given to the document
being family agreement is merely a part of an
afterthought in order ... that
secondary evidence can be adduced relating to a
document when the original has been destroyed or
lost, or when the party offering evidence
that of my father hence, even if it is believed that
the document is proved by giving it an Exhibit then
my father is dead ... that
secondary evidence can be adduced relating to a
document when the original has been destroyed or
lost, or when the party offering evidence
case of
the prosecution that the three applicants herein tried to destroy
evidence by creating evidence in their favour to show that they had
retired ... female members directly indulged into an act of
destroying the evidence by creating the documents to show that
they had retired from a partnership firm
made, then
it is for the party who seeks correction to produce documents
after carrying out necessary correction by the concerned statutory
authorities, Judicial Magistrate ... same document was produced earlier
with the passport application. Fresh fees will be charged.
(c) Where files have already been destroyed, PIAs could
use their
passport and asks for rectification/correction,
in all such cases the documents produced earlier as
proof of date of birth/place of birth ... provided the same
document was produced earlier with the passport
application. Fresh fees will be charged.
© Where files have already been destroyed, PIAs could
Police Station. The petitioner had in fact remained present
with all necessary documents. A detailed Statement has
also been recorded by the Police. It appears ... apprehension that as
threatened by the Police an important document may be
destroyed.
4. The Police Inspector of the Gondal City Police Station
shall
parted with, then, somebody may damage or destroy
it or may commit some mischief with such original document. It is also
submitted that when original
documents at
Ex.45 and 46, then the claim of complainant
about the accused demanding bribe amount to
show favour would have been totally
destroyed ... Goswami
cannot be relied upon, more particularly when
that noting is destroyed. Thus the evidence
of Investigating Officer suffers from this
serious infirmity and cannot
Claims Tribunal was destroyed. R & P which has now
been sent by the Claims Tribunal consists of skeletal
documents. The insurance policy