certified copy of the Inam Fair Register, in column No. 2, disclosed the classification of the inam as 'devadayam' and it was described ... documentary evidence clearly establishes "that the suit land was devadayam religious inam granted in favour of a religious institution viz., Kurathalwar Devasthanams situated
plaint.
5. Column (2) of the inam extract refers to the inam as devadayam padikasuvaithan kulam. It is true the use of the word devadayam ... inam grant as one made to the temple. In column (2) of the inam extract, the inam has been described as devadayam padikasuvaithan kulam
Inam Commissioner in his title deed confirmed the inam not in the name of the edom, but in the name of the uralars ... trustees for the time being." The inam was styled as Devadayam inam land and was confirmed as such and for the upkeep
Ramae Gounder & Sons Represented vs The Settlement Tahsildar on 28 May, 2015
Author: V
suit property belonged to the plaintiff mutt having been granted in inam to a previous head of the mutt by then ruler for the general ... Inam Commission on 16-5-1965, which issued also title deed No. 2460, to the plaintiff mutt. The said inam was confirmed as Devadayam Inam
certified copy of the inam statement filed during the inams enquiry before Mr. Taylor, the Inam Commissioner. It mentions that the 'sanad ... inam was confirmed. These relevant entries in the Inam Fair Register unmistakably and unequivocally point out that the inam was for a religious purpose (devadayam
decision I may refer to. There the holders of the inam divided the inam land between themselves. The suit was for a declaration that ... Government when it dealt with inams in 1859 appointed an Inam Commission for enquiring into the genuineness of the inams so that they
Puliampatti Village known as Andikadu had been granted as Devadayam Inam by a King of Mysore for the support of the Pagoda of Vellai Vinayagar ... Collector) after enquiry held that the land was Devadayam Inam land granted to the poojari of Vellai Vinayagar itemple for doing pooja in the temple
Amendment Act of 1934, notwithstanding the grant of portions thereof as devadayam inams to certain temples in the village.
13. The contention that
Berhampur Taluk. The petitioners alleged that the said village was a Devadayam inam belonging to Shri Jagannath Mahaprabhu under the merfatdari of the petitioners ... urged that as admittedly the petitioners' inam was a Devadayam inam, that is to say, a village granted for the maintenance of the deity
