Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 181 (0.03 seconds)

St vs *1. Sadanandan Nair

plaintiff Devaswom. The suit is prosecuted by Manager of the Devaswom appointed by HR and CE Department. Admittedly, the Devaswom was to be administered ... possession of the property from 1963 onwards. According to him, in 1963, the property was orally leased by Devaswom to his mother Lakshmi Amma
Kerala High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Hariprasad - Full Document

& vs Byadvs.Sri.Krishna Menon

Conservancy Act which are specifically made as applicable to the properties belonging to Devaswom. It was without any regard to the same, that ... According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the property of the Devaswom actually belongs to the 'Deity' who is a perpetual minor
Kerala High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - P R Menon - Full Document

Unknown vs Cochin Devaswom Board And Others

Gopalakrishnan, Sudhabahshini and Prathapan with intent to protect and preserve the Devaswom properties. An advocate commissioner was appointed and a report was called ... standing counsel for the Devaswom Board submits that, notwithstanding the lapses on the part of the Devaswom officers, the property in question belongs
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Asok Kumar vs Koottala Kshethra Samithy

over the plaint schedule property. A finding was also endorsed to the effect that the property in question is Devaswom property. 2. The aforesaid judgment ... Further, in order to fortify the argument that the said properties belonged to Thiruvanchikulam Devaswom, Sri.Ashok Kumar has produced the copy of the thandaper
Kerala High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - B K Pasha - Full Document

Kamala Devi Amma vs Rajan

that property to defendants 1 and 3. On the south of 4th defendant's property and in between the property of defendants ... plaint schedule property. Plaintiff and his predecessor were passing through the property of the 1st defendant in between the property

Kamala Devi Amma vs Rajan

that property to defendants 1 and 3. On the south of 4th defendant's property and in between the property of defendants ... plaint schedule property. Plaintiff and his predecessor were passing through the property of the 1st defendant in between the property

Sheela @ Rosa Franklin vs Mookkottil Devaswom

behalf of the Mookkottil Devaswom. According to the defendant, Mookkottil Devaswom has no right over the plaint schedule property. The defendant set up a specific ... ownership over the property. In the plaint, it is pleaded that the property belonged to Mookkottil Devaswom. Samithy claims only a right of administration. Therefore
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Hariprasad - Full Document

Prabhukumar vs The State Of Kerala

Devaswom and an obligation was cast upon the Devaswom, the Court, the District Collector and also Police officials to see that the Devaswom properties were ... 2010 8 with already, and to entrust the properties to the Devaswom forthwith, at the earliest, at any rate within one month from the date
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next