Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 68 (0.75 seconds)

Katira Construction Ltd vs Union Of India &

affidavits filed is that there is clear distinction between a developer and a contractor . All along, the benefits intended under section 80IA ... were for a developer and not for a contractor. The explanation only puts the issue beyond controversy. The amendment was within the legislative competence
Gujarat High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Sadbhav Engineering Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax ... on 9 April, 2014

respondent that the  assessee   is   a   Civil   Contractor   working   for   the  Government and is not a Developer and, therefore,  the   deduction   under   section   80IA ... same   context,   we   must   understand   the   expression   "developing   or   operating   and   maintaining   or   developing,   operating and maintaining". Keeping in mind   the   new   areas
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 7 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii vs Swastik Associates....Opponent(S) on 7 May, 2014

Radhe Developers would not  apply in cases, where the assessee had entered into an agreement for a  fixed remuneration and worked merely as contractor ... Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He  would appoint Sub­contractor or labour contractor for execution of the  work. The assessee was authorized to admit
Gujarat High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv vs Swastik Associates....Opponent(S) on 7 May, 2014

Radhe Developers would not  apply in cases, where the assessee had entered into an agreement for a  fixed remuneration and worked merely as contractor ... Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He  would appoint Sub­contractor or labour contractor for execution of the  work. The assessee was authorized to admit
Gujarat High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Acit vs Someshwar on 7 September, 2007

Radhe Developers would not apply in cases, where the assessee had entered into an agreement for a fixed remuneration and worked merely as contractor ... Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He would appoint Sub-contractor or labour contractor for execution of the work. The assessee was authorized to admit
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document

The vs M/S on 31 March, 2008

Radhe Developers would not apply in cases, where the assessee had entered into an agreement for a fixed remuneration and worked merely as contractor ... Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He would appoint Sub-contractor or labour contractor for execution of the work. The assessee was authorized to admit
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Assistant vs Shree on 8 April, 2008

Radhe Developers would not apply in cases, where the assessee had entered into an agreement for a fixed remuneration and worked merely as contractor ... Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He would appoint Sub-contractor or labour contractor for execution of the work. The assessee was authorized to admit
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next