Search Results Page

Search Results

31 - 40 of 808 (0.76 seconds)

Rajesh Builders , Navi Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax

party though he was permitted to engage contractors etc but the overall responsibility was of the developer. In short, assessee had no right in present ... Further, since the assessee is engaged in the business of builder, developer, contractor, estate agent etc. therefore, such transfer of development rights by the assessee
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vasant J, Khetani, Mumbai vs Assessee on 16 March, 2016

section is applicable if the payment is made by contractor to sub-contractor and this being not the case here , the provisions of Section 194C ... builder and developers and he employed others as contractors and contractors appointed sub-contractors to get the work done. The CIT(A) after considering
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dcit 4(1)(2), Mumbai vs Approach Properties P.Ltd, Mumbai on 26 December, 2018

India or aboard the business is real-estate, builders, developers, construction, contractors, designers, architects, decorators and brokers of all types of residential, non-residential buildings ... Association, the assessee's business is real-estate, builders, developers, construction, contractors, designers, architects, decorators and brokers of all types of residential, non-residential
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4   5 6 7 8 9 10 Next