gift deed, property
belonged to Prathibha Kumari and on her death, it devolved on
respondent/plaintiff, mother as her only legal heir. Respondent prayed ... favour is valid since
on the death of Bhuvanachandran, property devolved on his only legal heir,
deceased 1st defendant and hence deceased 1st defendant
concerned. If that be, so the said 1.5 cents
devolves on all the legal heirs of the said Surendran including first
respondent ... excluding the three cents covered by
Ext.A1 and which has devolved on the legal heirs of Surendran
consequent to his death is situated
first respondent for enjoyment till his death and
thereafter it devolved on Kanchi Kamakodi Madom
(respondent/third defendant represented that Madom). It is the
further ... which
according to the appellant revealed that the property was to
devolve on Ramaswamy Iyer on the death of Parvathy Ammal.
But, on going through
appellant) was staying.
In the meantime Kunhippathu died and her right also devolved on
her two sons, Mammed and Kunhavulla. Appellants ... year, 1998.
Kunhavulla died in the year, 2000. Right of Kunhavulla
(allegedly) devolved on the appellants and third respondent.
Hence the demand for partition
appellant) was staying.
In the meantime Kunhippathu died and her right also devolved on
her two sons, Mammed and Kunhavulla. Appellants ... year, 1998.
Kunhavulla died in the year, 2000. Right of Kunhavulla
(allegedly) devolved on the appellants and third respondent.
Hence the demand for partition
death of
Kunhiraman Nambiar, his undivided half share in the said
property devolved on himself and others and thus he is entitled
to partition
said
property. On the death of the parents, their half share devolved
on the 1st appellant, respondents and the deceased brother of
the 1st appellant
death of Madhavi Amma,
her right devolved on 1st respondent, her brother - Bhaskara Kidav and their
father. The father executed Ext.A3, release deed
outstanding with
one Pakkan on oral lease. On his death, the property devolved
on his legal heirs - Ammalu and the second plaintiff. The second
late Lakshmanan, he died
intestate and on his death, that building devolved on the respondent. It is also
RSA No.1220/2012 2
the case ... appellant
cannot be accepted. Consequently, on the strength of title which devolved on
RSA No.1220/2012 3
the respondent by inheritance she was given
