Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced ... Police, Manipur for direct recruitment. She was appointed
vide common order dated 05.02.2010 issued by DGP, Manipur. For
claiming relaxation of age, the petitioner produced
petition,
the legality of the order dated 22.04.202 issued by the DGP, Manipur
appointing those four candidates purportedly in compliance of the court ... order dated 22.04.2022 issued
by the DGP, Manipur, it has wrongly been mentioned that the appointment
was made in compliance of the Court
under the 15% out-of-turn
category and the appointment orders dated 24.12.2021 thereby
appointing the private respondents as SI of Police on promotion
under ... learned counsel for the
petitioner submitted that for recommendation by the DGP for
appointment by promotion under the 15 out-of-turn category
regular basis
and directed the concerned appointing authorities to issue formal
promotion orders. Consequently, the concerned appointing
authorities issued formal promotion order which includes ... private respondents furnished by the DGP. More over,
facing with the Contempt Case, the DGP or the Committee
appointed by the DGP has issued
