12
US (ISS)
Pl. Discuss.
Sd/-
12/4/12
SO (ISS)
Discussed.
Sd/-(13/4/12)
FR may kindly be seen. A letter ... Chattopadhyay)
US/12.7.2012
Director (E)
Sd/-
12/7/12
JS (E)
Sd/-
18/712
Dir (E)
Sd/-
18/7/12
US(C)
Ministry
folowing relieh-
ยป Declare the abovementioned B-Form DIR 12 aa non est and
direct that the same be disregarded;
ug} Issue clarification that the order ... August
2016, the respondents forwarded an E-FPorm DIR 12 with SRN No.
yIOLS8S38 to the Registrar of Cormpanies te be taken on record under
said DIR-12 and marked as Exhibit "F".
XII. On 16th December, 2014, the Form No. DIR 12 was filed
purporting to appoint ... DIR-12
and the same is marked as Exhibit "G"
On 17th December, 2014, the Respondent No. 2 filed the Form DIR
12
subsequently the ROC has not taken cognizance
of DIR 12. We are informed that the said order is under challenge before the
High Court under ... orders,
contends the fact that ROC has not taken cognizance of DIR 12, does not
tantamount to declare that removal of the Respondent
subsequently the ROC has not taken cognizance
of DIR 12. We are informed that the said order is under challenge before the
High Court under ... orders,
contends the fact that ROC has not taken cognizance of DIR 12, does not
tantamount to declare that removal of the Respondent
subsequently the ROC has not taken cognizance
of DIR 12. We are informed that the said order is under challenge before the
High Court under ... orders,
contends the fact that ROC has not taken cognizance of DIR 12, does not
tantamount to declare that removal of the Respondent
subsequently the ROC has not taken cognizance
of DIR 12. We are informed that the said order is under challenge before the
High Court under ... orders,
contends the fact that ROC has not taken cognizance of DIR 12, does not
tantamount to declare that removal of the Respondent
Order are
not material as they are not effective as no DIR 12 has actually been
submitted although the Respondent - original Petitioner has been removed ... Orders which
are in the nature of mandatory Orders to cancel DIR 12 etc. which were
not necessary.
12. We are not setting aside
illege,
non est and void. Subsequently, R2 has filed a DIR 12 qwith ROC falsely
recording that the Petitioner (1st respondent herein) was removed from
Return in
8
Company Appeal (AT) No. 182 of 2020
Form DIR - 12 was filed with the Registrar of Companies. In fact
Respondent
