Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (2.41 seconds)Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
Pramod Kishore Shrivastava vs Registrar Of Companies Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2024
Director of the accused company on 31-03-2015 as per DIR 12
filed by the accused company. Under the Act of 1956 only
company
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Smt. Nirmala Tyagi on 17 September, 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents
appended thereto.
12. This is a case where appellants are seeking interference in the order ... remained in custody due to political or social
cause under MISA/DIR in the period of Emergency.
13. In the year 2008, State Government framed
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Leela Devi Bansal on 17 September, 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents
appended thereto.
12. This is a case where appellants are seeking interference in the order ... remained in custody due to political or social
cause under MISA/DIR in the period of Emergency.
13. In the year 2008, State Government framed