Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 259/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
unequivocally establishes that petitioners were not Director of
accused
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 34/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 256/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 30/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 37/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 32/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Section 141 of NI Act against
them.
e) Because copy of DIR12 (ROC Record) is a public
document under provisions of Companies ... oral evidence is required
to prove the said document. Copy of DIR12 (ROC Record)
Case Registration No. 31/2019 Amit Kumar Sharma
Veena Pathak who were Incharge and
CR No. 32/12 Page 1
Dir. Of Enforcement Vs Veena Pathak
responsible for the business of the firm ... person is held liable under the
CR No. 32/12 Page 12
Dir. Of Enforcement Vs Veena Pathak
adjudication proceedings to put the penalty
petitioner and the accused no. 1 company. Had the Forms DIR 11 and
DIR 12 been immediately filed after the purported resignation letter
dated ... fact resigned on 01.05.2025. However, the fact that the
forms DIR 11 and DIR 12 have been filed much after the dishonour of
the cheque
