Rakshak Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. vs The Income-Tax Officer [Alongwith Ita ... on 8 September, 2003
Notified Party from doing that thing, then by reason of this legal disability, no penalty or interest can be levied on that party. Thus
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23044 (1.48 seconds)Ajay Kumar vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 8 January, 2007
loss of earning capacity in this case is assessed at 81%. Partially disabled-81%.
3. Petitioner filed complaint before the District Forum, Gorakhpur claiming total ... disability and praying compensation to the tune of Rs. 99,999. The District Forum decided the complaint in favour of the petitioner vide order dated
B.D.S. Kharab S/O Shiv Dhan Singh vs Union Of India Through on 30 April, 2010
provisions contained in the Act known as The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter to be referred ... effect from 9.9.1986, vide order dated 4.5.1987. The applicant because of physical disability, seeks promotion by reservation in the light of the provisions contained
Ultratech Cement Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cen Cir 1(4), Mumbai on 14 December, 2021
scheme of amalgamation or demerger after 31-3-
2007, the statute has disabled the enabling provision enshrined in sub-
section (12) of Section 80IA ... section (12A) in section 80IA of the IT Act, which
merely disabled the applicability of sub-section (12), cannot be
construed as withdrawal of right
Rakshak Chemicals (P) Ltd., Vapi vs Ito, Tds, Valsad on 8 September, 2005
Notified Party from doing that thing, then by reason of this legal disability, no penalty or interest can be levied on that party. Thus ... Advance Tax. Thus, under the Special Courts Act , there is a legal disability to pay Advance Tax. Yet under the Income
Anand Prakash Saksena vs Income-Tax Officer on 16 September, 1982
stated that the assessee had been suffering from a permanent physical disability other than blindness as a result of which the capacity to engage ... Tribunal, it was submitted that the assessee is suffering from a permanent disability inasmuch as his hearing continues to be very defective, although the assessee
Hawa Singh. vs Delhi Transport Corporation. on 24 March, 2011
declared that henceforth the provision of Section 47 of the Persons with Disability Act, 1995 should be complied in all cases where an employee acquires ... Disability during his service career and or being declared unfit by the DTC Medical Board. Therefore, the Circular could not be brought to the notice
Hari Singh vs Union Of India Through The on 13 January, 2015
Further, the Government of India has already enacted The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 to safeguard ... interests of any employee who acquires disability during his service. The said act is equally applicable for the employees of the Railways. Section
M/S Associated Soapstone Distributing ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 1 September, 2017
payments made by the company, were for the purpose of removing of
disability of the company trading operation which prejudiced its operation.
This was achieved ... that there is a sharp distinction
between the removal of a disability on one hand payment for which is a
revenue payment, and the bringing
Shyam Pyare Yadav vs Union Of India on 25 May, 2015
Further, the Government of India has already enacted The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 to safeguard ... interests of any employee who acquires disability during his service. The said act is equally applicable for the employees of the Railways. Section