Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 159 (0.85 seconds)

Mr.Ankush Vithoba Dhokale vs Dr.Anant Dinkar Bhosale & Anr on 10 August, 2010

certain information, which he tried to seek in respect of alleged permanent disability of the complainant and it includes communication dated 21/3/2005 received ... time of issuing said certificate, complainant-Mr.Ankush V.Dhokle was suffering disability more than 40%. 5.       It also further clarified that disability certificates
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Surinder Handa vs Hdfc on 28 September, 2010

admissible sum in terms of Annexure-1. Because she had sustained permanent disablement as per Table of Benefits-Table (B) of Annexure-I, thus ... disputed. While contesting the complaint, its stand was that because disability in terms of Annexure-I was not shown to be continuing for a period
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lic Of India vs Ali Mohd. on 19 January, 2010

Doctors, his condition did not improve and he was finally rendered total disabled on 11.7.2005 and became 100% blind. The Complainant sent an application ... Insurance Corporation for providing him disability benefits but the benefit was not extended to the Complainant on the ground that the Complainant could have been
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ranjit Singh vs Lic Anoopgarh on 18 March, 2010

certificate from Medical Board of Government Hospital, Sri Ganganagar which found 100% disability on the right upper limb. The sole question for consideration was whether ... disability in one hand could entitle the Complainant to receive compensation as provided under Condition No. 10(4) of the policy. The said condition reads
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next