child on any grounds including sex, caste, ethnicity, place of birth, disability and equality of access, opportunity and treatment shall be provided to every child
M.P. Steel Corporation vs Commnr. Of Central Excise on 23 April, 2015
Author: R
Tribunal/Additional First Member, Mandsor, Madhya Pradesh. The Tribunal
determined the permanent disability suffered by the appellant on account of
the motor vehicle accident ... annual income,
his future loss of income due to permanent disability suffered by him was
estimated at Rs.1,72,800/- and loss of income
Oriental Insurance Company vs Smt. Indiro & Others on 19 June, 2015
Author: Mansoor Ahmad
Under the
said scheme, the petitioners have to help the students with
disabilities to bring them in the main stream. The funds have
been disbursed ... petitioners are qualified, approved
and appointed on sanctioned posts over unit of disabled
students. There is requirement of services of the petitioners.
They
afford to the person by whom it may be invoked or what
disability it can create in the person against whom it operates
in cases
medievalistic outlook and status-oriented
approach which attaches social and economic disabilities to a person
belonging to a scheduled caste and that is why certain ... Hindu and becomes a Christian, the social and economic disabilities arising
because of Hindu religion cease and hence it is no longer necessary to give
interpretation
of a proviso contained in Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities
(Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act,
1995 (in short ... person who is permanently incapacitated and stated that he has 100%
disability and recommended that he be relieved from service on medical
grounds. On 27th
directly to
the Advocate was not permissible. Secondly, there was 44% disability
suffered by Respondent no.1 in respect of right lower limb on account ... engaged in doing knitting work. The Claims
Tribunal erred in taking functional disability to the extent of 44%. It
is thus, urged by the learned
passed by the
Armed Forces Tribunal holding the respondents entitled to claim disability
pension under the relevant Pension Regulations of the Army. The Tribunal ... taken the view that the disability of each one of the respondents was
attributable to or aggravated by military service and the same having been