Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 147 (1.29 seconds)

Molshree Aggarwal vs Union Public Service Commission (Upsc) on 25 September, 2025

disability, namely Specific Learning Disability (dyslexia), to the extent of more than forty per cent, duly recognised under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act ... namely persons with intellectual disability, specific learning disability, autism spectrum disorder, mental illness, and multiple disabilities. Learned counsel submitted that the reliefs
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharath Kumar V vs Social Justice And Empowerment on 7 January, 2025

categorization within the broad Disability Categories), which not only goes against the mandate of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred ... categorised as Locomotor Disability (LD), Visual Handicap (VH), and Hearing Impediment (HI).The candidates claiming reservation under the Persons with Disability Act will be categorised
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avai Kumar vs Defence on 21 November, 2025

case of TRANFEMORAL AMPUTATION LEFT. He/she is physically disabled/ visual disabled/speech & hearing disabled and has 80% (Eighty percent) permanent (physical impairment/visua ... dated 08.10.2018 and the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Disabilities Act, 2016 . He contended that the definitions and protections under
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neha Sangwan vs Gnctd on 3 September, 2025

professional or technical courses) for Persons with Disabilities under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Disabiliti Act, 2016 ,, incorporating the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... misplaced, as it pertains to persons with disabilities under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 . 3.2 The applicant herein, however, does not fall
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lovkush Ravi vs Northern Railway on 17 April, 2025

contended that the respondents have violated the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 , and its 2017 Rules, thereby depriving the applicant of his opportunity ... disability of 40% or more in the categories covered under Section 34(1) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 . A post
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Barkha Yadav vs Dsssb on 17 December, 2025

seen with reference to the provisions of the Disabled Act. Digitally signed by JYOTI JAIN Date ... provision as contained in the Right of person with Disability Act, it does not preclude the applicant from seeking exemption, more particularly, in light
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next