Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

treated as non-est in the eyes of law. Moreover, discriminatory treatment has been meted out by sending some of the employees of Respondent

14th June, 1996 has considered the challenge to discriminatory treatment meted out to teaching and non-teaching employees of non-government aided Ayurvedic and Unani ... equal opportunity. It noted that said staff was singled out for hostile discriminatory treatment and the resulting disparity in service conditions, was thus held unsustainable

14th June, 1996 has considered the challenge to discriminatory treatment meted out to teaching and non-teaching employees of non-government aided Ayurvedic and Unani ... equal opportunity. It noted that said staff was singled out for hostile discriminatory treatment and the resulting disparity in service conditions, was thus held unsustainable

14th June, 1996 has considered the challenge to discriminatory treatment meted out to teaching and non-teaching employees of non-government aided Ayurvedic and Unani ... equal opportunity. It noted that said staff was singled out for hostile discriminatory treatment and the resulting disparity in service conditions, was thus held unsustainable

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought

provided under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D", is discriminatory and criteria applied is irrational and arbitrary. It is contended that ... prescribed under clauses 1 and 3 of Schedule "D" is discriminatory and since it does not have any nexus with the object sought