Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1829 (1.63 seconds)

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Indian Hotel & Retaurants Assn.& Ors on 16 July, 2013

exploitation of women dancers. Consequently, the operation of the impugned enactment is discriminatory. 17. With these observations, the High Court declared that Sections ... Therefore, according to the learned senior counsel, the impugned enactment is not discriminatory as it makes a reasonable legislative classification which has a direct nexus
Supreme Court of India Cites 86 - Cited by 77 - A Kabir - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next