period of his office, been in possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income which the public servant cannot satisfactorily
though the evidence
collected during investigation disclosed that the appellant
had assets disproportionate to his known source of income,
as the evidence was not strong ... violating different conduct rules and misconduct
of being in possession of property disproportionate to his
known source of income. After giving reasonable opportunity
and conducting
consumer, for the breach of contract thereof which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party
custody before the Court would involve such inconvenience as would be disproportionate in the circumstances of the case; (c) no appeal presented under Section
finding by the Tribunal that the punishment imposed
was 'shockingly' disproportionate to the gravity of charges.
In Ranjit Thakur Vs. Union of India ... after arriving at a finding that the
punishment was 'shockingly' disproportionate that this Court
interfered with the punishment and that too under Article
Trial-Judgment
only after due observance of Judicial Process-Quantum of
punishment disproportionate to offence Whether conclusive
evidence of bias.
Interpretation of Statutes: Procedural safeguards ... participated in and dominated
the proceedings; (iii) by awarding a punishment so
disproportionate to the offence as to amount in itself to
conclusive evidence
Public servant--Possession of pecuniary re-
sources or property disproportionate to known sources of
income----Prosecution after superannuation-Previous sanc-
tion-- Whether necessary.
Judge ... Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 --Possession of
property disproportionate to known sources--Whether fact
within special knowledge of the public servant--Burden of
proof
which the public servant cannot satisfactorily account, of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income. (2) Any public servant, who commits
alleged and proved against the complainants the punishment
of dismissal was grossly disproportionate and, therefore, it
amounted to unfair labour practice on the part ... could not be said that the punishment of
dismissal was shockingly disproportionate. Even on that
ground the complaints were liable to be dismissed
that the punishment of dismissal imposed
upon the employee was harsh and disproportionate and no reasonable
employer could impose such punishment for the proved misconduct ... service of the employee, so as to amount to a
shockingly disproportionate punishment;"
Section 27 of the Act provides that, inter alia, no employer