objection under Section 4 raising a membership dispute is concerned, the same is not within the jurisdiction of the Registrar/Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies ... Chits and a membership dispute can only be decided by means of a civil suit.
Under the circumstances, therefore, this writ petition is disposed
Members, the Deputy Registrar is not required to adjudicate the Membership dispute but insofar as the provisions of Section ... dispute to the Prescribed Authority who is required to decide the Membership dispute as an ancillary issue which affects the election of a particular Member
into a dispute only regarding the elections and continuance of office bearers and can only incidentally look into the dispute of membership of electoral college ... dispute in respect of any election.
63. However, the proceedings before the Prescribed Authority are summary in nature as regards deciding a dispute regarding membership
from the date of the dispute till final realisation to the disputant No. 7 and the Disputant No. 2 in respect of their Flat ... date of the dispute till final realisation to the disputant No. 6 and disputant No. 1 as per membership register record of the society
inviting reply upto 23.12.2011. All these complaints and cross complaints regarding membership dispute became a subject matter of examination and the Deputy Registrar passed ... Societies Registration Act, 1860 could legally determine the membership dispute so far as the Society in question is concerned?; (b) as to what
matter of grant of membership to those 281
persons, may be a subject-matter of a
membership dispute to be raised before the
statutory authorities ... alleging illegal grant of 281
numbers of membership. Here the grant of membership
of 40 numbers of membership were sought to be
challenged
society in furtherance to order dated 08.04.2005. It is submitted that dispute of membership is highly disputed question of fact which requires adjudication by oral ... collusion with respondent No.4. To sum up, the petitioners have disputed the membership in the society which, of course are disputed questions of facts
Capital Mind
to participate despite the fact that all three memberships were
disputed. The petitioners objected to the draft minutes through
letters dated 22 October ... Both
sides have voted for each other in these disputed memberships. If
these two votes are excluded, the voting would stand
Capital Mind
to participate despite the fact that all three memberships were
disputed. The petitioners objected to the draft minutes through
letters dated 22 October ... Both
sides have voted for each other in these disputed memberships. If
these two votes are excluded, the voting would stand
another inquiry officer per letter dated 25.10.2018 to enquire again the dispute of membership which was again a frivolous and illegal exercise by District Inspector ... been initiated way back in the year 2020 itself when membership dispute has been arises because of action taken by one Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhadana
