2013 Smt. Manju V/s Bright Industries and others two dissenting judgments have been passed by President and Member. As such, the case should ... member. The dissenting judgments passed by President and Member are not final judgment and appeal is not maintainable against these two dissenting judgments.
In view
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017
Equivalent citations: AIR 2017
leading
opinion of three Judges held that the judgment in Cooper affirms the dissenting
24
Cooper (Supra note 4), at page 289 (para ... decision in Maneka, in fact,
expressly recognized that it is the dissenting judgment of Justice Subba Rao in
Kharak Singh which represents the exposition
last 70 years illuminated
some of them. In a series of judgments commencing from E.P. Royappa v.
State of Tamil Nadu & Another ... dealing with article 14 has been dynamic. Justice Mathew in his
dissenting Judgment in Bennett Coleman & Co. and Others v. Union of India
Chinnappa Reddy, J., in his dissenting judgment
19
summarised the position in law on this point as follows
(at page 591): (SCC p. 712, para
alienation in favour of a third party.
Even the dissenting judgment of S.B. Sinha, J. had on this point noted:
62. It is also
Dr. Shashi Tharoor vs Arnab Goswami And Anr on 1 December, 2017
Equivalent citations: AIR
learned counsel argued that the State Commission has also relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.T. Koshy ... Justice K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member sent dissenting judgment. As Members of the Bench differed in their opinion, the matter was placed before
pages 142-143)
B.C. Ray, J. dissented from this view and followed the view of the
Allahabad High Court, which accords the view ... numerical strength of six learned Judges. If
the dissenting judgment of B.C. Ray, J. is to be added to the Kothari
Products (supra) line
come into play in the present case.
34. A Full Bench judgment of this court reported at (2009) 1 CHN 852 (Sony
Kabushiki Kaisha ... their goods
as that of the respondents." The dissenting judgment of the later Division Bench
pertained to registered mark 'Sony', which
