5663/2020 ORDER DATED: 21/12/2021
who introduced himself as a divorcee. The petitioner refers to
the copy of profile and uploaded images ... during that
period, the complainant had given impression that he was
divorcee and was willing to marry the petitioner. Somewhere
in the month of October
postal pensioner expired on 17/09/2017. The
Family pension claimed by Divorcee daughter Smita
H Parmar. As per Divorce paper divorce paper was
filed ... pension rule 1972 rule 54 clarification no 27 the
Divorcee daughter Smita H Parmar is not eligible
for family pension the rule is reproduced here
postal pensioner expired on 17/09/2017. The
Family pension claimed by Divorcee daughter Smita
H Parmar. As per Divorce paper divorce paper was
filed ... pension rule 1972 rule 54 clarification no 27 the
Divorcee daughter Smita H Parmar is not eligible
for family pension the rule is reproduced here
complainant with that of the
applicant no.1 is of divorcee. The divorce deed was
executed before the Notary in presence of two witnesses
complainant with that of the
applicant no.1 is of divorcee. The divorce deed was
executed before the Notary in presence of two witnesses
wife before his marriage with the complainant
herein, who herself was a divorcee at the relevant time. However,
on account of some issues, different complaints
wife before his marriage with the complainant
herein, who herself was a divorcee at the relevant time. However,
on account of some issues, different complaints
witnesses. Further stated
that since the respondent no.2 was never a divorcee and
as she has a first husband, she is not entitled ... registration itself shows
the status of the respondent no.2 as being divorcee and
the documents, produced by the petitioner, procured
under Right to Information
other family
members or by the wife of the applicant, who is
divorcee and the family members can take care of
their financial needs
other family
members or by the wife of the applicant, who is
divorcee and the family members can take care of
their financial needs
