common order.
3. The present appeals arise out of orders dated (i) 11.11.2022
in Criminal Petition No. 5710 of 2021 (the ‘Impugned Order ... Vide the Impugned Orders, the High Court refused to
quash the Docket Order dated 20.07.2021 which reinitiated
criminal proceedings against the Appellants for offences
5937 of 2016. As a consequence of the
said observations, the docket order dated 21.07.2014 passed by
the Court of XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad,
Miyanpur ... same, the
learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad by the impugned
docket order accepted the protest petition filed by the
complainant/appellant herein and consequently observed
said Rami Reddy on 22.12.2003.
Appellant filed an objection thereto. No order was passed on the said
application. The counsel appearing on behalf ... said judgment of acquittal holding:
"A perusal of the docket order passed by the Court
below, coupled with the extract of diary maintained
said order, on 17.1.1993, the
contractor filed three applications in the pending suit: (i)
I.A. No.1/1993 under Order VI Rule ... three applications were allowed
by the subordinate Judge vide docket order dated
2.2.1993. Order passed in I.A. No.3/1993 reads as
follows
pronouncement of the
decision. The additional charge sheet and the cognizance order had
been in place before the Trial Court since 2013. The additional charge ... filed by the fourth
respondent before this Court which contains the docket order of the Additional
Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli. In an order dated
SARFAESI
Act, petitioner has the alternative remedy against the
impugned order by filing appeal before the appellate
Tribunal. However, having regard to the fact that ... application was pending for
three years before the Tribunal. From the docket
order dated 21.09.2020, we find that a junior counsel
appearing on behalf
dated 03.11.1989 passed in O.S. No. 787 of 85
and docket orders in O.S. No. 787 of 85 along with photocopy
dispute with
regard to its nature and boundaries. Trial Court,
by docket order dated 07.02.2017, allowed the
application filed by the respondent and appointed
Taad presented himself before the
said Police Station with a written Docket in
order to register it the contents, which are
as under: From Chowki ... police has been found. Hence through the
medium of said Docket it is requested that
the matter may be recorded in the Daily
Diary
Section 482
Cr.P.C., the ultimate result whereof was that the order of bail granted
in favour of the accused for an offence under ... under the aforesaid
offences by virtue of the order passed by the High Court. The dockets
of the High Courts are full and there
