Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 185 (2.13 seconds)Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Construction Catalysers Private ... vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2024
categorically opined that
since the impugned order therein was an unsigned document, it lost
its efficacy in the light of Rule
Murari Lal Kedia And Anr vs Smt. Moushumi Bagchi And 4 Ors on 3 January, 2022
adduce secondary evidence on the ground that the said original documents
have been lost and as such, there is no necessity for any interference with ... categorically come to a finding that 12 numbers of
documents have been lost on the ground and reasons mentioned in the
said order.
From
Murari Lal Kedia And Anr vs Moushumi Bagchi And 4 Ors on 3 January, 2022
adduce secondary evidence on the ground that the said
original documents have been lost and as such, there is no necessity for
any interference with ... categorically come to a finding that 12
numbers of documents have been lost on the ground and reasons
mentioned in the said order.
From
Kanika Rabha Kalita vs Nindeswari Rabha on 4 March, 2024
petitioner is given an additional opportunity
to bring on record those documents which were filed along with the
petition on 16.06.2023 by adducing additional evidence ... petitioner
not submitting the original documents at the proper time, judicial time has
been unnecessarily lost and thereby causing a delay in the said
proceedings
Presently Residing At Vill-Khanamukh vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 9 February, 2024
upon physical verification of
documents to be submitted in terms with Clauses 8, 13 & 18 of the bidding document.
On the basis ... granting two weeks
time to the official respondents to physically verify the documents so submitted by each
and every bidder in respect to the Mahal