rejecting the
petitioner's representation for Missing/Lost Documents vide
Application No.15200211231604104802 dated 02/11/2023 link
documents in respect of Plot bearing ... enclosing all the necessary
documents and duly furnishing all the particulars of the documents
he has lost and enclosing the paper publication dated
documents would
amount to secondary evidence.
2. Whether the original documents of the documents,
sought to be admitted, are proved as lost.
4
3. Whether ... nature of the documents and the probative value of the documents
and possibilities of tampering the documents have to be taken into
consideration, before permitting
could not trace out
the document would be sufficient evidence of the fact that
the document had been lost."
7. Learned counsel appearing ... could not trace out the document would be sufficient
evidence of the fact that the document had been
lost........"
8. While arguing the matter
paper publication was also made by the defendant about his lost
documents vide document No.1869 of 2006 dated 05.09.2006
along with other documents ... seven years not taking any action with regard to the documents lost
by him. As the defendant has denied the execution
respondents/plaintiffs have not laid any
actual foundation that said document is lost and they have also
not proved that the same is executed ... could not trace out the
document would be sufficient evidence of the fact that the
document had been lost. (Ramakrishna Constructions,
Karimnagar v. Singareni Collieries
same
judgment as follows:
"A document would be admissible on basis of the recitals made
in the document and not on basis ... denying the delivery of possession,
the endorsement/recital in the document lost all its effect and
efficacy.
It would be trite to say that
that the impugned order in the instant case being an
unsigned document lost its efficacy under the GST Act and the
GST Rules. Thus, conclusion ... difficulty in accepting the argument of
Sri Swaroop Oorilla that unsigned document will not be hit by
Rule 26 (3) of the GST Rules
that the impugned order in the instant case being an
unsigned document lost its efficacy under the GST Act and the
GST Rules. Thus, conclusion ... difficulty in accepting the argument of
Sri Swaroop Oorilla that unsigned document will not be hit by
Rule 26 (3) of the GST Rules
that the impugned order in the instant case being an
unsigned document lost its efficacy under the GST Act and the
GST Rules. Thus, conclusion ... difficulty in accepting the argument of
Sri Swaroop Oorilla that unsigned document will not be hit by
Rule 26 (3) of the GST Rules
that the impugned order in the instant case being an
unsigned document lost its efficacy under the GST Act and the
GST Rules. Thus, conclusion ... difficulty in accepting the argument of
Sri Swaroop Oorilla that unsigned document will not be hit by
Rule 26 (3) of the GST Rules
