both the parties and
Advocate of the complainant. It is a notarized document. It appears that
parties have settled their dispute outside the Commission
also the
case of the opponent insurance company that the documents and
information as submitted by the complainant were not sufficient to asses
the loss ... directions for giving
opportunity to the complainant to file affidavit duly notarized with
documents. Accordingly, the complaint was taken for fresh enquiry and
also
filed his own affidavit-in-evidence. He
produced the notarized copies of the following documents:- receipt
dated 10/05/2012
complainant had submitted all the relevant documents as required and also the affidavits and declarations, duly notarized. In spite of the same, the Opposite parties
Yogesh vs Dlf Homes Panchkula on 21 April, 2017
Daily Order
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
hand, the serious
contention of counsel for OP is that neither the document of attorney
deed has been embossed by the competent authority in India ... find that the alleged document of special power of attorney holder
is Ex.C-15. It is notarized at S.A.S. Nagar Mohali only
notarized from
Notary Public, Mohali on 4.3.2015, which clearly showed that it is
unregistered document. On merits it was pleaded that opposite
party
Dharmpal vs Dlf Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., on 11 July, 2017
Daily Order
STATE CONSUMER
recorded. After that the claim was lodged
with the Ops alongwith required documents. However, vide letter
dated 4.3.2015, the claim was illegally repudiated. Alleging
deficiency ... been stated that the vehicle was driven by Avtar Singh. In a
notarized affidavit, complainant intimated that vehicle was driven
by one Kulwinder Singh
done. He requested Ops to issue the necessary
documents/ registration certificate but all in vain. He moved
application before the SSP, Rupnagar on 12.8.2015 against ... completion of all the
documents and it was further settled that complainant will further
pay Rs. 15,000/- to Op No. 1 which were paid