place and the place where PW.1 was
attacked. At about 12.00 p.m. the dog squad and clues team came
to the scene ... Police, Uppalaguptam, that the dog squad moved around the
residential houses of accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 and the dog stopped
deposed that he had gone to the place of incident with the Dog Squad. Six corpses, whose necks were cut and the corpse ... finger prints there nor did the field unit find any weapon of attack at the spot. There was no facility of climbing up the wall
In Re: Govinda Reddy And Ors. vs Unknown on 20 September, 1957
Equivalent citations: AIR1958KANT150
Rakkappan shows that there were three
or four persons, who had attacked the deceased Anandan and
they all ran away, after the incident ... that crowd.
● P.W.-3 also speaks about the presence of Sniffer Dog and that
itself shows the presence
blood stains
and foot prints were photographed by the police. A sniffer dog was brought. Police
had recorded her statement and obtained her signature ... husband only after being informed that he had been attacked, the
wooden log seized had been shown to her when she was examined
accused persons, accused Sanjay Jaat and
his brother Rahul @ Pankaj had also attacked the complainant,
his sons, his brothers and nephew with Pistol, Sword ... side below the shoulder and the
accused Saroj Choudhary let/opened her dogs on the
complainant and the dogs had bitten the complainant. The
complainant
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2013
Equivalent citations: 2013 AIR
Rathinam @ Rathinan vs State Of Tamilnadu & Anr on 6 October, 2009
Equivalent citations: 2010
Rama Kant Verma vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 2 December, 2008
Equivalent
Vishal Yadav vs State Govt. Of Up on 6 February, 2015
Author: Gita Mittal
Bench
