Mukhtiar Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 14 January, 2011
been suggested that Mukhtiar Singh has fired a shot
at ferocious dog, which attacked him to explain the empty cartridge in
the gun. Such cross
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 89 (1.42 seconds)Girish Chandra Bajpayee vs State Of U.P. on 23 May, 2019
Police officials and that too also without any attack on it by stray animals especially dogs and vultures like crows etc.
3.11 This is also
Yalangi Satyanarayana Chinna 6 Others vs The State Of Telangana on 14 June, 2018
place and the place where PW.1 was
attacked. At about 12.00 p.m. the dog squad and clues team came
to the scene ... Police, Uppalaguptam, that the dog squad moved around the
residential houses of accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 and the dog stopped
Sajan Singh @ Chajju vs State Of Punjab on 12 March, 2018
Amritsar.
2. As per the allegations in the FIR, a large crowd attacked the injured-
complainant with sharp as well as blunt weapons and inflicted ... young boy studying in Class XII and was
attacked while he was bringing his dog back from the veterinary Doctor after
getting him inoculated
Kashmir Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab on 27 April, 2011
Tarsem
Singh stating therein that Tarsem Singh had attacked on
the eye of a pet (dog) of Harpal Singh, however, police has
Crl. Misc
Ravinder Singh Punn And Other vs State Of Punjab And Another on 11 October, 2022
that the petitioners allegedly
attacked the complainant and his family members because they
had objected when the petitioners set their dogs loose on the
street
Muthuramalingam vs State By Inspector Of Police on 14 December, 2007
very natural manner. He has not claimed
that he has seen the attack made on the every person. He has only spoken about
A18 Malaiyandi ... another contention of the learned counsel is about summoning of
police sniffer dogs to the place of occurrence. The learned counsel would
contend that since
Muthuramalingam vs State By Inspector Of Police [Alongwith ... on 14 December, 2007
very natural manner. He has not claimed that he has seen the attack made on the every person. He has only spoken about A18 Malaiyandi ... another contention of the learned counsel is about summoning of police sniffer dogs to the place of occurrence. The learned counsel would contend that since
Kanagu (A) Kanageswaran And Another vs State By Inspector Of Police B-8, Police ... on 18 September, 2000
occurrence that A1 came to
their house and pelted stones at their dog. Therefore, their identifying A1 on
the date of occurrence is categorical ... also
clear with regard to A1 possessing the weapon MO1 aruval and attacking the
deceased with the same. The doctor PW8, who conducted post mortem
Robil Shah @ Kale And Ors. vs State [Along With Crl. A. No. 416/1999] on 4 January, 2005
house when at about 2.30 AM he heard barking of dogs as a result of which he awoke. On coming out of house ... yards plot. He challenged them to prevent the trespass. They attacked him. On hearing noise, his brothers Ranjit and Suresh reached the spot. Rajender