Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri Madhusudan Singh vs Gita Devi And Ors on 14 February, 2020 Author: Aditya Kumar

contention of the petitioner(s) is that the plaintiff has the dominus litis. They cannot be forced to fight litigation against a party, against whom ... impleadment of parties is that the plaintiff in a suit, being dominus litis, may choose the persons against whom he wishes to litigate and cannot

contention of the petitioner(s) is that the plaintiff has the dominus litis. They cannot be forced to fight litigation against a party, against whom ... impleadment of parties is that the plaintiff in a suit, being dominus litis, may choose the persons against whom he wishes to litigate and cannot

suit. Further, he has submitted that under principles of dominus litis the plaintiffs have right to make party only to those against whom they have ... doubt about the proposition that plaintiff is the dominus litis of his own suit. The theory of dominus litis cannot be overstretched in the matter

Counsel for the respondent No. 5 submits that the plaintiff being Dominus-litis cannot be asked to joint parties and if he had joined certain ... that the general law says that the plaintiff is dominus-litis and is entitled to join the party of his own choice but this right

assailed before me. 3. Ordinarily a plaintiff to a suit is dominus litis. It is for him to decide the forum where the suit

should not as a general rule apply the principle of 'dominus litis' in favour of the plaintiff as a rule of universal application

Court reiterated that the plaintiff is dominus litis having dominion over his Case. He is the person who has carriage and control of the action

premises, the eviction suit fails. 17. Fourth, the plaintiff being a dominus litis cannot be compelled to make any third person a party

suit for partition where the plaintiff is not wholly dominus litis and the plaintiff cannot defeat the exercise of option to have a partition