whereof is permitted to be
done by the plaintiff who is dominus litis vests an election in the
plaintiff to invoke the jurisdiction, either ... where there are plural or
multiple remedies available, the principle of dominus litis has clear
application and that there is an inherent right in every
said application on the singular reason that plaintiff is the dominus litis and,
therefore, such application cannot be allowed.
3. Shri Seth, learned counsel ... petitioners is rejected on the singular reason that plaintiff is the
dominus litis and he alone can decide as to who should be impleaded
irregularity with the order
impugned. No doubt, plaintiff is a dominus litis and he
cannot be compelled to sue a person against whom he does ... claim any relief, but the doctrine of dominus litis
would not come into play when a person would be
adversely affected for no fault
irregularity with the order
impugned. No doubt, plaintiff is a dominus litis and he
cannot be compelled to sue a person against whom he does ... claim any relief, but the doctrine of dominus litis
would not come into play when a person would be
adversely affected for no fault
contention of the petitioner(s) is that the plaintiff has
the dominus litis. They cannot be forced to fight litigation against a
party, against whom ... impleadment
of parties is that the plaintiff in a suit, being
dominus litis, may choose the persons
against whom he wishes to litigate and
cannot
contention of the petitioner(s) is that the plaintiff has
the dominus litis. They cannot be forced to fight litigation against a
party, against whom ... impleadment
of parties is that the plaintiff in a suit, being
dominus litis, may choose the persons
against whom he wishes to litigate and
cannot
dismissed the same. He further submitted that the
plaintiff is the dominus litis and she cannot be forced to add parties
against whom, she does ... further submit that it is the prerogative of the plaintiff
as dominus litis to implead the persons. In support of his contention,
he relied
proper and necessary party,
the theory that the plaintiff is the dominus litis is not always an absolute
rule and the Court is required ... Court ought not to over
stretch the theory of dominus litis. As seen from the facts of the present
case, the reason
proper and necessary party,
the theory that the plaintiff is the dominus litis is not always an absolute
rule and the Court is required ... Court ought not to over
stretch the theory of dominus litis. As seen from the facts of the present
case, the reason
proper and necessary party,
the theory that the plaintiff is the dominus litis is not always an absolute
rule and the Court is required ... Court ought not to over
stretch the theory of dominus litis. As seen from the facts of the present
case, the reason
