DPCs are apparently not in tune with the grades in the ACRs, the DPC should approximately substantiate its assessment by giving reasons so that ... ignored by the DPC. We reiterate, the same parameters would have followed had the DPC considered that the concerned ACR of the applicant had been
DPC. In the same DPC, these Officers were also
considered under the extended assessment criteria for the succeeding
year(s), in which ACR ... DPC. In the same DPC, they were considered for
the successive years and with a fresh input of next ACR(s) and were
declared
DPC. In the same DPC, these Officers were also
considered under the extended assessment criteria for the succeeding
year(s), in which ACR ... DPC. In the same DPC, they were considered for
the successive years and with a fresh input of next ACR(s) and were
declared
DPC. In the same DPC, these Officers were also
considered under the extended assessment criteria for the succeeding
year(s), in which ACR ... DPC. In the same DPC, they were considered for
the successive years and with a fresh input of next ACR(s) and were
declared
DPC. In the same DPC, these Officers were also
considered under the extended assessment criteria for the succeeding
year(s), in which ACR ... DPC. In the same DPC, they were considered for
the successive years and with a fresh input of next ACR(s) and were
declared
minutes of DPC, Mr. Sharma, argued that it has
been clearly mentioned in the proceedings that DPC perused the entire
record of ACRs ... DPC(s) are apparently not in line with the grades in ACRs,
the DPC should appropriately substantiate its assessment by giving
reasons, which can only
gradings in some of the ACRs in
the reckoning and thus being non-communicated ACRs, their
consideration by the DPC was illegal and against ... ACRs
cannot be considered by a DPC and therefore, if the DPC has taken
into consideration uncommunicated adverse ACRs, the DPC deserves
to be quashed
DPC and considering the expunged ACR gradings when adverse ACRs are expunged. In the present case the Very Good ACRs had the same adverse impact ... holding the Review DPC. In other words, DOP&Ts objection to hold the Review DPC to reconsider the ACRs for the years
DPC decided to categorize rating as 'GOOD'.
F.Y.2006-07 :
The DPC considered,
(1) the entry in the ACR "No flair ... year of ACR. It is not on the
ACR of the applicant for the year 2008-09 that the DPC focusses its attention
provision to communicate the ACR before 2008-09,
but if the ACR of the previous period is required for DPC after 2008-09,
the same ... finality and (ii) the
Regular DPC had already been held on 15.05.2014.
(4.4) The DPC further noted that the ACR was upgraded without
any Speaking
