impugned
orders, repelling the contention of petitioners herein that the DPC
proceedings began when requisition was issued to the
departmental heads on 10.01.2012 prescribing ... recommended by the Dec. 2012 DPC, although they were
promoted on the recommendation of 2013 DPC; the review DPC
became imperative also because of earlier
impugned
orders, repelling the contention of petitioners herein that the DPC
proceedings began when requisition was issued to the
departmental heads on 10.01.2012 prescribing ... recommended by the Dec. 2012 DPC, although they were
promoted on the recommendation of 2013 DPC; the review DPC
became imperative also because of earlier
impugned
orders, repelling the contention of petitioners herein that the DPC
proceedings began when requisition was issued to the
departmental heads on 10.01.2012 prescribing ... recommended by the Dec. 2012 DPC, although they were
promoted on the recommendation of 2013 DPC; the review DPC
became imperative also because of earlier
impugned
orders, repelling the contention of petitioners herein that the DPC
proceedings began when requisition was issued to the
departmental heads on 10.01.2012 prescribing ... recommended by the Dec. 2012 DPC, although they were
promoted on the recommendation of 2013 DPC; the review DPC
became imperative also because of earlier
impugned
orders, repelling the contention of petitioners herein that the DPC
proceedings began when requisition was issued to the
departmental heads on 10.01.2012 prescribing ... recommended by the Dec. 2012 DPC, although they were
promoted on the recommendation of 2013 DPC; the review DPC
became imperative also because of earlier
Additional
Principal Secretary along with others by quashing the
above proceedings of the DPC and order of promotion ... bias, malafide
and arbitrariness, the selection calls for
interference. Where the DPC has proceeded in
a fair, impartial and reasonable matter, by
applying the same
from the date others were given promotion as per the DPC
proceedings and the promotional order dated 24th March 2021 under
Annexure ... gradation
list under Annexure-D/2 remains undisputed, and the DPC proceeded
according to the seniority prescribed in the gradation list.
WP(C) No.14488
publication of the final gradation list and for
completion of the DPC proceedings. He further alleged that
Page 2 of 4.
although such time line
limited to the context of the conduct
of DPC proceedings. Be that as it may no decision in those
proceedings concerning the consequential promotion given
petition seeking for a direction to quash the proceedings of the
Departmental Promotion Committee (hereafter 'DPC') held on
2
15.07.2016 for promotion ... foregoing discussions, we are of the
humble view that the proceedings of DPC held on 15.07.2016 for
promotion to the post of Additional Principal Secretary
