witnesses for prosecution were examined before the
Trial Judge and 43 draft charges were placed for his
consideration. The prosecution examined specific witnesses
with reference ... allegations supporting the draft
charges and documents were also produced to support the
allegations. The Trial Judge framed 21 charges against the
respondent and discharged
time being approved in this behalf by the Board; (b) legal charges for drafting any agreement between the assessee and any other person ... assessee is a company, also expenditure- (i) by way of legal charges for drafting the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company
Court
requested Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader, to
prepare draft charges and submit the same in two weeks. It also
appears that ... Court on 20th June, 2006 directed to circulate the
draft charges to the parties concerned. On 30 th June, 2006, this Court
had taken
Haryana.
Mr. Shanti Bhushan, learned senior
counsel has objected to the draft charges Nos.1,
4, 7 and 8. The objections were regarding the
very ... State that the very appointment
itself requires consideration, therefore, these
draft charges require to be looked into. As
regards other charges, it was alleged
preparation of draft charges. Shri Mukherji opined that there was sufficient material for framing charges and also prepared five draft charges and forwarded the same ... this case merely because the Enquiry Officer prepared the draft charges, it does not mean that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated by the Enquiry Officer
petitioner and G.Ravindra Babu,
PC-2408 and also send necessary draft charges against them for
taking necessary action. Subsequently, Respondent No.l issued
Orders ... respondent with a request to send draft charges against the
petitioner and another accused in Anti-Corruption Bureau case to
frame Articles of Charge against
vide Annexure-3, which was
pending. Draft charges were framed against the President on
24.2.1999 under Annexure-4 for the alleged misconduct, dereliction
in duty ... authority as per Rule 21 of the
1974 Rules. Since the draft charges have not been issued by the
Governing Body under Annexures
Dy.Cit (E) -2(1) , Mumbai vs Mumbai Educational Trust, Mumbai on 30 September, 2022
find
out if there was material for framing charges and prepared
draft charges, it cannot possibly be said that when he was
later appointed ... Mukherji
for his views and for the preparation of draft charges if
institution of disciplinary proceedings was to be
recommended. Shri Mukherji expressed his opinion
called for from the District Collector, Madurai on 02.02.2010 and
24.05.2010, draft charges were framed on 07.06.2010 and the same were sent for
concurrence ... Vigilance and Anti-corruption Department on 18.01.2011 and
the draft charges were approved by the Vigilance and Anti-corruption Department
on 29.01.2011. Thereafter, the charge
