Ajay Kumar Mishra vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 21 June, 2004
finally recommended departmental proceeding against the petitioner and has also forwarded draft charges and evidence for the same. It is contended by the petitioner that
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 284 (0.80 seconds)Umeshwar Upadhyay vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 29 April, 2004
directions made, the conducting officer (respondent No. 4) framed draft charges on the next day, i.e., 21.2.2002 against the petitioner alleging, that ... from custody. The petitioner was directed to submit explanation to the draft charges contained in Annexure-4. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 4.2.2002 expressing
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs Associated Petroleum Corpn. on 29 June, 2004
policy of the respondents, the dealers who are not paying towards draft charges/cheque collection charges, an amount of Rs. 18.00 per KL from ... those who have made payment by Bank draft, but have refused to those who have made payment by Banker's Cheque. It is specifically
Association Of Corporations & Apex,, vs Assessee on 5 November, 2004
days from the date of the receipt of goods. All draft charges shall
be borne by ACASH. Draft shall be payable at Delhi
Vijay Shankar vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 29 September, 2004
respondent authorities issued a fresh charge memorandum dated 29.10.97 by re-drafting the charges and giving full particulars about the other accomplices. On this occasion
Canara Bank vs Presiding Officer, Central Government ... on 12 July, 2004
work as Incharge of Demand Draft Department at Khairagarh Branch with effect from 1.7.1980. The Bank Drafts bearing No. 85010 dated ... served with a charge-sheet containing two charges, namely :
(a) Fraudulent preparation of the Bank Drafts referred to above, and
(b) Negligence with the missing
Swarup Vegetable Products Indus. Ltd. vs Jt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 30 June, 2004
same to the fund by separate bank draft or cheques on account of contribution and administrative charges. The employer is required
Ansal Housing And Construction Ltd. And ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 29 July, 2004
response thereof, the petitioner by a Demand Draft dated 13-6-1994 deposited the aforesaid charges. In the meantime, the Army evicted all the staff ... respondent No. 2, tendered an amount of Rs. 75 lacks by Demand Draft dated 31 -5-2000 being 15% consideration in respect of the land
National Air Products Ltd. (Napl), ... vs Haryana Urban Development Authority ... on 5 February, 2004
placed on record showing that the petitioner was to pay the development charges as and when levied by the Town and Country Planning Department ... were to pay @ Rs. 15/- per sq. yard towards the temporary development charges. The total demand raised in respect of the land of the petitioner
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004
TAMILNADU
India
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code