enough and
the petitioner is required to submit the "Draft
Charges" and this Court is required to frame such
charges, which ... hearing. According to Shri.Dixit, neither
the petitioner has furnished the draft charges nor
this Court has framed the draft charges as yet though
accordingly requested to come prepared on 19th April 1937 with draft charges against each group of accused in the light of the above order ... 19th April draft charges were submitted by the Public Prosecutor and the following order was passed:
Draft charges scrtinized. Akhil, Rabindra, Ramdin, Ramananda, Prafulla, Dwijen
Pardon.
xiv) On 5-7-1995 the prosecution submitted first draft charges and again on 14-2-1996 submitted revised draft charges and again ... submitted revised draft charges, copies whereof were furnished to the accused.
xv) On 19-2-1997 Hon'ble Chief Justice assigned this case
frame draft charges and the draft charges framed are on the record. Those charges were undoubtedly framed as charges which would be tried ... within the jurisdiction of this Court" appear in the draft charges. However, as the Magistrate himself admits in the commitment order, he changed
necessary, the Prosecution can assist
the Trial court, by filing draft charges."
http://www.judis.nic.in
4
4. Aggrieved by the same ... learned Senior counsel further submitted that the prosecution has
already given draft charges to the trial Court and it is only based
transferred to another
Special Judge, who framed 21 charges and declined to frame
22 other charges proposed by respondent No. 1. This Court
allowed respondent ... appeal by special leave except in
regard to three draft charges under s. 384 IPC , and
requested the High Court to nominate another Judge
direction the Assistant Public Prosecutor supplied the magistrate with a draft of 67 charges, who then proceeded to frame them against all the accused, except ... beyond his capacity to deal. He therefore merely accepted the draft charges presented to him by the Assistant Public Prosecutor. We are in sympathy with
applicant. Mention therein is to the allegations which are subject matter of charges 1 to 4. The applicant filed a detailed reply ... Further, the very fact that before receipt of DGPs comments draft charges had since already been framed, would prove conclusively that
powers to the Clerk of the Crown to revise and re-draft charges with reference to any offence in respect of which the committing Magistrate ... accused No. 3, two separate trials will proceed. on the charges as re-drafted by the Clerk of the Crown
accused present. Advocate for accused absent. IO absent.
APP directed to file draft charge. Accused directed to keep
their Advocate present on the next date ... November, 2007.
12/11/2007 All accused present. Time to file draft charges extended till 3rd
December, 2007.
3/12/2007 All accused present. Charge
